| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmd.cgi in (1) Nagios 3.0.5 and (2) op5 Monitor before 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to send commands to the Nagios process, and trigger execution of arbitrary programs by this process, via unspecified HTTP requests. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on Motorola Surfboard with software SB5100-2.3.3.0-SCM00-NOSH allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (device reboot) via the "Restart Cable Modem" value in the BUTTON_INPUT parameter to configdata.html, and (2) cause a denial of service (hard reset) via the "Reset All Defaults" value in the BUTTON_INPUT parameter to configdata.html. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wp-newblog.php in WordPress multi-user (MU) 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the weblog_id parameter (Username field). |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in E-Publish 5.x before 5.x-1.1 and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta1, a Drupal module, allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as other users via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Thomson/Alcatel SpeedTouch 7G router, as used for the BT Home Hub 6.2.6.B and earlier, allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via unspecified POST requests, as demonstrated by enabling an inbound remote-assistance HTTPS session on TCP port 51003. NOTE: an authentication bypass can be leveraged to exploit this in the absence of an existing administrative session. NOTE: SpeedTouch 780 might also be affected by some of these issues. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in account-inbox.php in TorrentTrader Classic 1.08 allow remote attackers to perform certain actions as other users, as demonstrated by sending messages. |
| WordPress 2.6.3 relies on the REQUEST superglobal array in certain dangerous situations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct delayed and persistent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via crafted cookies, as demonstrated by attacks that (1) delete user accounts or (2) cause a denial of service (loss of application access). NOTE: this issue relies on the presence of an independent vulnerability that allows cookie injection. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FAQ Ask module 5.x and 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that access unpublished content. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in PyForum 1.0.3 and possibly earlier versions, and possibly zForum, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of victims for requests that change passwords, and other unspecified requests, via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Scriptsez.net Ez Poll Hoster (EPH) allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete polls via the delete_poll action to index.php; and hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) delete users via the manage action to admin.php, or (3) send arbitrary email to arbitrary users in the email action to admin.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin.php in ScriptsEz Ez Blog 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a blog via the add_blog action, (2) approve a comment via the approve_comment action, (3) change administrator information including the password via the admin_opt action, and (4) delete a blog via the delete action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in administration/administrators.php in Link Up Gold 5.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Moodle 1.8 before 1.8.11 and 1.9 before 1.9.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CutePHP CuteNews 1.4.6 and UTF-8 CuteNews before 8b allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new users, including a new administrator, via an adduser action in the editusers module in index.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Quick.CMS 2.4 and Quick.CMS.Lite 2.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of the administrator for requests that (1) delete web pages via a p-delete action to admin.php, and possibly (2) delete products or (3) delete orders via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| phpMyAdmin before 2.11.5 accesses $_REQUEST to obtain some parameters instead of $_GET and $_POST, which allows attackers in the same domain to override certain variables and conduct SQL injection and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks by using crafted cookies. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple PHP Blog (SPHPBlog) 0.4.9 allow remote attackers to perform delete actions as administrators via (1) the block_id parameter to add_block.php or (2) the link_id parameter to add_link.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 1024 CMS 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by (1) an unspecified action that creates a file containing PHP code and (2) unspecified use of the forum component. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| Drupal 5.x before 5.3 does not apply its Drupal Forms API protection against the user deletion form, which allows remote attackers to delete users via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
