| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| OXID eShop before 2016-06-13 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a GET or POST request to the oxuser class. Fixed versions are Enterprise Edition v5.1.12, Enterprise Edition v5.2.9, Professional Edition v4.8.12, Professional Edition v4.9.9, Community Edition v4.8.12, Community Edition v4.9.9. |
| Bamboo 2.2 before 5.8.5 and 5.9.x before 5.9.7 allows remote attackers with access to the Bamboo web interface to execute arbitrary Java code via an unspecified resource. |
| Remote Code Execution vulnerability in symphony/content/content.blueprintsdatasources.php in Symphony CMS through 2.6.11 allows remote attackers to execute code and get a webshell from the back-end. The attacker must be authenticated and enter PHP code in the datasource editor or event editor. |
| In FineCMS through 2017-07-07, application\core\controller\template.php allows remote PHP code execution by placing the code after "<?php" in a route=template request. |
| typed-function before 0.10.6 had an arbitrary code execution in the JavaScript engine. Creating a typed function with JavaScript code in the name could result arbitrary execution. |
| A code injection vulnerability exists in SAP TREX / Business Warehouse Accelerator (BWA). The vendor response is SAP Security Note 2419592. |
| A code injection in the supportconfig data collection tool in supportutils in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 and 12-SP1 and SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 and 12-SP1 could be used by local attackers to execute code as the user running supportconfig (usually root). |
| math.js before 3.17.0 had an arbitrary code execution in the JavaScript engine. Creating a typed function with JavaScript code in the name could result arbitrary execution. |
| SetsucoCMS all versions allows remote authenticated attackers to conduct code injection attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| October CMS build 412 is vulnerable to PHP code execution in the asset manager functionality resulting in site compromise and possibly other applications on the server. |
| phpMyBackupPro before 2.5 does not validate integer input, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by injecting scripts via the path, filename, and period parameters to scheduled.php, and making requests to injected scripts, or by injecting PHP into a PHP configuration variable via a PHP variable variable. |
| phpMyBackupPro 2.5 and earlier does not properly escape the "." character in request parameters, which allows remote authenticated users with knowledge of a web-accessible and web-writeable directory on the target system to inject and execute arbitrary PHP scripts by injecting scripts via the path, filename, and dirs parameters to scheduled.php, and making requests to injected scripts. |
| Adobe Campaign versions 16.4 Build 8724 and earlier have a code injection vulnerability. |
| PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in the Gwolle Guestbook plugin before 1.5.4 for WordPress, when allow_url_include is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the abspath parameter to frontend/captcha/ajaxresponse.php. NOTE: this can also be leveraged to include and execute arbitrary local files via directory traversal sequences regardless of whether allow_url_include is enabled. |
| Huawei OceanStor UDS devices with software before V100R002C01SPC102 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted UDS patch with shell scripts. |
| FineCMS 2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by using a URL Manager "Add Site" action to enter this code after a ', sequence in a domain name, as demonstrated by the ',phpinfo() input value. |
| Code injection vulnerability in Bitdefender Total Security 12.0 (and earlier), Internet Security 12.0 (and earlier), and Antivirus Plus 12.0 (and earlier) allows a local attacker to bypass a self-protection mechanism, inject arbitrary code, and take full control of any Bitdefender process via a "DoubleAgent" attack. One perspective on this issue is that (1) these products do not use the Protected Processes feature, and therefore an attacker can enter an arbitrary Application Verifier Provider DLL under Image File Execution Options in the registry; (2) the self-protection mechanism is intended to block all local processes (regardless of privileges) from modifying Image File Execution Options for these products; and (3) this mechanism can be bypassed by an attacker who temporarily renames Image File Execution Options during the attack. |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter a file inclusion vulnerability, which is a type of vulnerability that is most commonly found to affect web applications that rely on a scripting run time. This issue is caused when an application builds a path to executable code using an attacker-controlled variable in a way that allows the attacker to control which file is executed at run time. This file inclusion vulnerability subverts how an application loads code for execution. Successful exploitation of a file inclusion vulnerability will result in remote code execution on the web server that runs the affected web application. |
| Palo Alto Networks Panorama VM Appliance with PAN-OS before 6.0.1 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via a crafted firmware image file. |
| NTP before 4.2.8p10 and 4.3.x before 4.3.94, when using PPSAPI, allows local users to gain privileges via a DLL in the PPSAPI_DLLS environment variable. |
