Export limit exceeded: 18107 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 421034 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11054 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11054 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-10992 | 1 Roncoo | 1 Roncoo-pay | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in roncoo roncoo-pay up to 9428382af21cd5568319eae7429b7e1d0332ff40. Affected is an unknown function of the file /user/info/lookupList. Executing manipulation can lead to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10941 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability was determined in Topaz SERVCore Teller 2.14.0-RC2/2.14.1. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file SERVCoreTeller_2.0.40D.msi of the component Installer. Executing manipulation can lead to permission issues. The attack needs to be launched locally. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains, that "this vulnerability was detected at the beginning of 2025, it was remediated because the latest published version of the installer no longer uses "nssm," which is responsible for this vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2025-68027 | 2 Themefic, Wordpress | 2 Hydra Booking, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Themefic Hydra Booking hydra-booking allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Hydra Booking: from n/a through <= 1.1.32. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26396 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| The SolarWinds Dameware Mini Remote Control was determined to be affected by Incorrect Permissions Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability requires local access and a valid low privilege account to be susceptible to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1078 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in AppHouseKitchen AlDente Charge Limiter up to 1.29 on macOS and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function shouldAcceptNewConnection of the file com.apphousekitchen.aldente-pro.helper of the component XPC Service. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.30 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and acted very professional. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10725 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Ai | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Openshift AI Service. A low-privileged attacker with access to an authenticated account, for example as a data scientist using a standard Jupyter notebook, can escalate their privileges to a full cluster administrator. This allows for the complete compromise of the cluster's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attacker can steal sensitive data, disrupt all services, and take control of the underlying infrastructure, leading to a total breach of the platform and all applications hosted on it. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68869 | 2 Lazycoders, Wordpress | 2 Lazytasks, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in LazyCoders LLC LazyTasks lazytasks-project-task-management allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects LazyTasks: from n/a through <= 1.2.37. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10657 | 1 Docker | 1 Desktop | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In a hardened Docker environment, with Enhanced Container Isolation ( ECI https://docs.docker.com/enterprise/security/hardened-desktop/enhanced-container-isolation/ ) enabled, an administrator can utilize the command restrictions feature https://docs.docker.com/enterprise/security/hardened-desktop/enhanced-container-isolation/config/#command-restrictions to restrict commands that a container with a Docker socket mount may issue on that socket. Due to a software bug, the configuration to restrict commands was ignored when passed to ECI, allowing any command to be executed on the socket. This grants excessive privileges by permitting unrestricted access to powerful Docker commands. The vulnerability affects only Docker Desktop 4.46.0 users that have ECI enabled and are using the Docker socket command restrictions feature. In addition, since ECI restricts mounting the Docker socket into containers by default, it only affects containers which are explicitly allowed by the administrator to mount the Docker socket. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10650 | 1 Softiron | 1 Hypercloud | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH. Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3. No generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected. There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1037 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Tropos | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| By making minor configuration changes to the TropOS 4th Gen device, an authenticated user with the ability to run user level shell commands can enable access via secure shell (SSH) to an unrestricted root shell. This is possible through abuse of a particular set of scripts and executables that allow for certain commands to be run as root from an unprivileged context. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10247 | 1 Jepaas | 1 Jepaas | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in JEPaaS 7.2.8. This vulnerability affects the function doFilterInternal of the component Filter Handler. Such manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7973 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk View | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A security issue exists in FactoryTalk ViewPoint version 14.0 or below due to improper handling of MSI repair operations. During a repair, attackers can hijack the cscript.exe console window, which runs with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to spawn an elevated command prompt, enabling full privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0628 | 1 Berriai | 1 Litellm | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An improper authorization vulnerability exists in the main-latest version of BerriAI/litellm. When a user with the role 'internal_user_viewer' logs into the application, they are provided with an overly privileged API key. This key can be used to access all the admin functionality of the application, including endpoints such as '/users/list' and '/users/get_users'. This vulnerability allows for privilege escalation within the application, enabling any account to become a PROXY ADMIN. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0505 | 1 Arista | 1 Cloudvision Portal | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| On Arista CloudVision systems (virtual or physical on-premise deployments), Zero Touch Provisioning can be used to gain admin privileges on the CloudVision system, with more permissions than necessary, which can be used to query or manipulate system state for devices under management. Note that CloudVision as-a-Service is not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8758 | 1 Trendnet | 1 Tew-822dre | 2026-04-15 | 7 High |
| A vulnerability was found in TRENDnet TEW-822DRE FW103B02. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component vsftpd. The manipulation leads to least privilege violation. Attacking locally is a requirement. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0327 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management vulnerability exists for two services (of which one managing audit trail data and the other acting as server managing client request) that could cause a loss of Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of engineering workstation when an attacker with standard privilege modifies the executable path of the windows services. To be exploited, services need to be restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0140 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ App on macOS devices enables a locally authenticated non administrative user to disable the app even if the GlobalProtect app configuration would not normally permit them to do so. The GlobalProtect app on Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome OS and GlobalProtect UWP app are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0139 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Autonomous Digital Experience Manager allows a locally authenticated low privileged user on macOS endpoints to escalate their privileges to root. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9863 | 1 Miniorange | 1 Otp Verification | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Miniorange OTP Verification with Firebase plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 3.6.0 due to the insecure 'administrator' default value for the 'default_user_role' option. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to register an administrator user even if the registration form is disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9779 | 1 Redhat | 1 Acm | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Open Cluster Management (OCM) when a user has access to the worker nodes which contain the cluster-manager or klusterlet deployments. The cluster-manager deployment uses a service account with the same name "cluster-manager" which is bound to a ClusterRole also named "cluster-manager", which includes the permission to create Pod resources. If this deployment runs a pod on an attacker-controlled node, the attacker can obtain the cluster-manager's token and steal any service account token by creating and mounting the target service account to control the whole cluster. | ||||