Export limit exceeded: 413914 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 413914 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 413914 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 413914 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (413914 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-79859 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-8 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79858 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol in AOS-8. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain and modify sensitive information in the underlying database and to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79857 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| There is a command injection vulnerability in the PAPI protocol (Aruba's access point management protocol) of AOS-8 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets to the affected UDP port. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79856 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8 that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative access, modify system configurations, and access or manipulate sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79855 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the SSH daemon of AOS-8 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to gain administrative privileges leading to complete compromise of the AOS-8 host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79854 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against the AOS-10 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79853 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Sensitive information disclosure vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79852 | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against the AOS instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79851 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79850 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass existing authentication controls and run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79849 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79848 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79847 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets to the affected interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79846 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Command injection vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-8 that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79844 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115845 | 1 Aws | 1 Aws Mcp Server | 2026-10-23 | 6.4 Medium |
| An incomplete list of disallowed inputs in the Python code validator of the run_script tool in AWS MCP Server might allow an authenticated remote user to execute arbitrary code within their own isolated session environment via a crafted script. AWS fixed this issue service-side. No customer action is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98735 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | 4.7 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_core: Serialize ACL scheduling with channel deletion hci_chan_sent() selects a channel under RCU but drops the read lock before accessing chan->conn and returning the channel. The ACL and LE schedulers then use its packet queue and update its transmit counters without any protection against channel deletion. After TX selects a channel and releases RCU, a disconnect command timeout on the separate request workqueue can run hci_conn_failed() and l2cap_conn_del(). hci_chan_del() can then unlink the channel, complete synchronize_rcu(), purge its queue and free it before TX resumes. This causes use-after-free both in hci_chan_sent() and in its callers. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 Workqueue: hci0 hci_tx_work Call Trace: hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 hci_tx_work+0x5e6/0xb70 Allocated by task 91: hci_chan_create+0xe3/0x350 l2cap_conn_add.part.0+0x12/0xa30 l2cap_chan_connect+0x110d/0x1b60 l2cap_sock_connect+0x310/0x530 Freed by task 99: hci_chan_del+0x11f/0x170 l2cap_conn_del+0x4f1/0x800 l2cap_connect_cfm+0x88c/0xd30 hci_conn_failed+0x150/0x250 hci_abort_conn_sync+0x3e3/0x800 hci_cmd_sync_run+0x7e/0xc0 hci_abort_conn+0x105/0x1f0 disconnect_sync+0x157/0x290 hci_cmd_sync_work+0x13c/0x290 Hold the existing device mutex across channel selection and transmission in both schedulers to serialize them with channel teardown. Keep timeout handling outside the critical sections because hci_link_tx_to() acquires the same mutex. This also permits the transmit path to sleep, unlike extending the RCU read-side critical section across packet submission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98759 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | 6.8 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: tipd: fix uninitialized typec_partner_desc in cd321x_update_work() cd321x_update_work() passes a stack-allocated typec_partner_desc to typec_register_partner() after initializing only usb_pd, accessory and identity. typec_register_partner() copies attach and deattach from the descriptor into the partner. With those fields left unset, garbage function pointers may be stored and later invoked from typec_partner_link_device() when a USB device is linked to the port. Uninitialized pd_revision and usb_capability similarly leak stack data through partner sysfs. Zero-initialize the descriptor so optional callbacks remain NULL and the remaining fields are zero. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98772 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | 4.7 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: serial: fix port tear down use-after-free Some drivers for multiport devices access port driver data from completion handlers of shared URBs submitted at attach() or first open() and stopped at disconnect() or last close(), respectively. A simple NULL check before accessing the driver data makes sure that a port state container has at least been allocated, but a completion handler can still race with port tear down. Reorder the disconnect handling so that ports are not deregistered (and their driver data freed) until after all ports have been hung up and the driver disconnect() callback has run so that all I/O has been stopped. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91638 | 1 Oracle | 1 Essbase | 2026-10-23 | 9.9 Critical |
| Vulnerability in Oracle Essbase (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 21.8.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Essbase. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Essbase, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Essbase. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||